引用本文:周建丰,顾亚琴,韦寿祺.SVC与STATCOM的综合比较分析[J].电力自动化设备,2007,27(12):57-60
.Comprehensive comparative analysis of SVC and STATCOM[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2007,27(12):57-60
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3824次   下载 2816 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
SVC与STATCOM的综合比较分析
周建丰,顾亚琴,韦寿祺
作者单位
摘要:
静止无功补偿器(SVC)和静止同步补偿器(STATCOM)都是无功补偿的重要装置,在输出特性、损耗、响应时间、谐振、谐波、控制方法、价格等方面对两者进行详细的比较分析,指出STATCOM作为一种新型的无功补偿装置比传统的SVC具有损耗小、响应速度快、不产生谐振、谐波含量少、能在一定范围内提供有功功率等优点。但STATCOM控制较复杂,且成本较高,在实际应用中应根据电网的具体要求选择或综合配置。
关键词:  电压质量,静止无功补偿器,静止同步补偿器,无功补偿
DOI:
分类号:TM761
基金项目:
Comprehensive comparative analysis of SVC and STATCOM
ZHOU Jian-feng  GU Ya-qin  WEI Shou-qi
Abstract:
Both SVC(Static Var Compensators) and STATCOM(STATic synchronous COMpensator) are important equipment of reactive compensation,which are comprehensively compared in output characteristics,loss,response time,resonance,harmonics,control method and price.It is pointed out that,as a new kind of var compensation equipment,STATCOM has less loss,fast response,no resonance,less harmonics,more complicated control and higher cost,and supplies active power at a certain range.Their configuration in power grid depends on the actual applications.
Key words:  voltage quality,SVC,STATCOM,reactive compensation

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫