引用本文:黄启帆,陈洁,曹喜民,刘俊,张育超,包洪印.基于碱性电解槽和质子交换膜电解槽协同制氢的风光互补制氢系统优化[J].电力自动化设备,2023,43(12):168-174
HUANG Qifan,CHEN Jie,CAO Ximin,LIU Jun,ZHANG Yuchao,BAO Hongyin.Optimization of wind-photovoltaic complementation hydrogen production system based on synergistic hydrogen production by alkaline electrolyzer and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2023,43(12):168-174
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 4640次   下载 714 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
基于碱性电解槽和质子交换膜电解槽协同制氢的风光互补制氢系统优化
黄启帆1, 陈洁1, 曹喜民1, 刘俊2, 张育超2, 包洪印2
1.上海电机学院 电气学院,上海 201306;2.中船海为(新疆)新能源有限公司,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830099
摘要:
工程应用中碱性电解槽(AEL)和质子交换膜电解槽(PEMEL)在制氢效率和经济性上各有优劣。对此,提出AEL和PEMEL协同的复合电解槽制氢方案。利用网络层次分析法确定2类电解槽的最优容量比,将复合电解槽应用在风光互补制氢系统中,对单一AEL制氢、单一PEMEL制氢、复合电解槽制氢3种方案的多项指标进行对比分析。结果表明:在相同容量下,复合电解槽制氢设备成本是单一PEMEL制氢设备成本的52.26 %,制氢量可达单一PEMEL制氢量的97.69 %,比单一AEL制氢量多46.13 %,显著优化了系统的经济性和制氢效率,验证了所提复合电解槽协同制氢方案的有效性。
关键词:  碱性电解槽  质子交换膜电解槽  网络层次分析法  制氢效率  经济性
DOI:10.16081/j.epae.202310024
分类号:
基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金资助项目(2022D01C366)
Optimization of wind-photovoltaic complementation hydrogen production system based on synergistic hydrogen production by alkaline electrolyzer and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer
HUANG Qifan1, CHEN Jie1, CAO Ximin1, LIU Jun2, ZHANG Yuchao2, BAO Hongyin2
1.School of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 201306, China;2.CSSC Haiwei(Xinjiang) New Energy Co.,Ltd.,Urumqi 830099, China
Abstract:
For engineering applications, alkaline electrolyzer(AEL) and proton exchange membrane electrolyzer(PEMEL) have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of hydrogen production efficiency and economy. For this reason, a synergistic composite electrolyzer scheme for hydrogen production of AEL and PEMEL is proposed. The optimal capacity ratios of the two types of electrolyzers are determined using analy-tic network process, and the composite electrolyzer is applied to the wind-photovoltaic complementation hydrogen production system, and a number of indexes of three schemes, namely, single AEL, single PEMEL, and composite electrolyzer, are compared and analyzed. The results show that under the same capacity, the cost of the composite electrolyzer hydrogen production equipment is 52.26 % of the cost of the single PEMEL hydrogen production equipment, and the amount of hydrogen production can be up to 97.69 % of the amount of hydrogen produced by a single PEMEL, which is 46.13 % higher than that by a single AEL, which signifi-cantly optimizes the system’s economy and efficiency of hydrogen production, and verifies the validity of the proposed scheme of composite electrolyzer synergistic hydrogen production.
Key words:  alkaline electrolyzer  proton exchange membrane electrolyzer  analytic network process  hydrogen production efficiency  economy

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫