| 引用本文: | 檀勤良,丁毅宏.考虑碳交易的火电节能调度优化模型及应对模式[J].电力自动化设备,2018,(7): |
| TAN Qinliang,DING Yihong.Optimal energy-saving dispatching model for thermal power considering carbon trading and its coping mode[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2018,(7): |
|
| 摘要: |
| 电力行业的发展所带来的环境问题日益突出，为发展低碳电力，将碳交易引入调度目标。构建以能耗成本与碳排放成本最小为目标的理想节能调度模型以及以发电燃煤成本与碳排放成本最小为目标的合同电量节能调度模型，分析碳交易下2种节能调度模式对火电的影响，并构建生物质与火电联合调度模型作为碳交易与节能调度双重约束下的应对模式。从节能减排、发电效益、机组运行3个方面构建调度效果评价指标体系。算例研究表明：高排放高耗能机组发电份额被进一步削减；理想模式比合同电量模式有较多的节能减排量、较高的发电收益及较差的机组运行稳定性；应对模式在3个方面都优于另外2种模式，通过分析碳交易对联合调度的影响验证了应对模式的合理性。 |
| 关键词: 节能发电调度 碳排放权交易 优化模型 联合调度 火电 |
| DOI：10.16081/j.issn.1006-6047.2018.07.024 |
| 分类号:TM73;TM611 |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71373077) |
|
| Optimal energy-saving dispatching model for thermal power considering carbon trading and its coping mode |
|
TAN Qinliang1,2, DING Yihong1
|
|
1.School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;2.Research Center for Beijing Energy Development, Beijing 102206, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Since the environmental problems brought by the development of power industry is becoming increasingly serious, the carbon trading is introduced in the dispatching objective to develop the low-carbon electricity. The ideal energy-saving dispatching model with the minimum energy consumption cost and carbon emission cost as its objective and the contract power energy-saving dispatching model with the minimum coal-fired cost of power generation and carbon emission cost as its objective are built, and the impact of two energy-saving dispatching modes on the thermal power under carbon trading is analyzed to build the collaborative dispatching model of biomass and thermal power as the mode for dealing with the double constraints of carbon trading and energy-saving dispatching. The evaluation index system of dispatching effect is constructed from three aspects, i. e. energy-saving and emission reduction, power generation benefit, and unit operation. Case study shows that the power generation share of the units with high emission and energy consumption is further reduced, the ideal mode has more energy saving and emission reduction and generating benefit but worse operation stability of the units compared with the contract power mode, the coping mode is better than the other two modes in the three aspects, and its rationality is verified by analyzing the influence of carbon trading on the collaborative dispatching. |
| Key words: energy-saving generation dispatching emission permit trade of carbon optimal model collaborative dispatching thermal power |
