引用本文:刘梓洪,程浩忠,王秋梅,武寒,$2,杨立兵,赵筠筠,励刚.不同电力市场交易模式下的网损分摊方法[J].电力自动化设备,2004,(7):60-64
.Loss allocation methods for different power market transaction models[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2004,(7):60-64
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3787次   下载 2 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
不同电力市场交易模式下的网损分摊方法
刘梓洪,程浩忠,王秋梅,武寒,$2,杨立兵,赵筠筠,励刚
作者单位
摘要:
联营体模式、双边交易模式和两者的混合模式是三种典型的电力市场交易模式。不同的电力市场交易模式对网损分摊方法的选择有着重要的影响。首先,对不同网损分摊方法的基本原理、模型算法及其特点进行了阐述,着重指出了潮流跟踪法适用于联营体模式,而边际网损系数法适用于双边交易模式和混合模式。最后,对某2243个节点系统夏季峰荷、腰荷和谷荷三个典型系统运行方式进行了实例计算.验证了方法的可行性和有效性。
关键词:  电力市场 交易模式 网损分摊 潮流跟踪法 边际网损系数法
DOI:
分类号:TM731 F123.9
基金项目:高等学校优秀青年教师教学和科研奖励基金资助(ZDXM03006)
Loss allocation methods for different power market transaction models
LIU Zi-hong1  CHENG Hao-zhong1  WANG Qiu-mei2  WU Han3  ZHOU Jian3YANG Li-bing 3  ZHAO Jun-jun3  LI Gang 3
Abstract:
Pool model,bilateral model and their hybrid model are three typical power market transaction models. The power market transaction models play a key role in selecting loss alloca-tion method. The basic principles and mathematical models of different loss allocation methods are discussed. It is mainly pointed out that the power flow tracing method is especially suitable for pool model,while the marginal loss coefficient method is useful for bilateral and hybrid models. The computation results of three typical base cases of a practical 2 243-node transmission system demonstrate that the two suggested loss allocation methods are feasible and effective. This work was supported by the Teaching and Research Award Program for Outstanding YoungTeachers in High Education Institutions of MOE,China(ZDXM03006).
Key words:  power market,transaction model,loss allocation,power flow tracing method,marginalloss coefficient method,

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫